University of Minnesota  Administrative Policy

Entering Into Contracts

Policy Statement

University contracts define the rights, commitments, and expectations of the University and the other party, help prevent misunderstandings by clearly outlining terms and conditions, and safeguard the University’s legal, financial, and operational interests. Only those individuals with proper delegated authority may enter contracts on behalf of the University and they must ensure that risks are assessed and managed prior to entering into the contract.

Scope

This policy applies to all contracts, including but not limited to: purchase agreements for goods or services, leases, licenses, use agreements, memoranda of understanding, and program agreements. $0 agreements, click-through agreements and online licenses may constitute contracts if they include obligations binding the University.

Delegation of Authority Requirements

In accordance with the Board of Regents Policy: Reservation and Delegation of Authority and Administrative Policy: President's Delegations of Authority, an individual with delegated authority to enter a University contract must:

  • Act within limits of delegated authority Sign contracts only if they are within the scope, financial limits and subject matter defined in the delegation. No contract signed by an individual lacking delegated authority will create any obligation for the University. Unauthorized signatures may subject the individual to personal liability or disciplinary action.
  • Understand the Contract Read and comprehend all terms and conditions. Ensure it is accurate, for a proper purpose, in the best interests of the University and advances its mission.
  • Assess Risks Evaluate legal, financial, operational and reputational risks before signing (see Appendix: Assessing Risk in the Business Terms of a Contract).
  • Avoid breach of contract Have practices in place to ensure the contract terms do not conflict with existing University contracts (for example, the University has an exclusive beverage provider and there may be exclusive arrangements and campus-wide obligations in athletic facility naming agreements). Consult with Subject Matter Experts as needed.
  • Seek Expert Advice Consult the appropriate subject matter experts to identify risks, confirm compliance requirements and obtain any required reviews (see Appendix: Required Review by Subject Matter Experts).
  • Mitigate Risks Confirm that the contract does not create an unreasonable risk to the University’s mission, reputation or funds, and verify that the University can meet its contractual obligations.

No contract signed by an individual lacking delegated authority will create any obligation for the University. Unauthorized signatures may subject the individual to personal liability or disciplinary action.

Business Risk

Units must not enter into a contract that exposes the University to unreasonable risks. Before proceeding, units should consider the likelihood that a risk will occur, the potential impact if it does, and the most severe realistic outcome. (See Appendix: Assessing Risk in the Business Terms of a Contract.) Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the individual with delegated authority to enter the agreement to confirm the contract does not create an unreasonable risk to the University’s mission, reputation or funds. Evaluation of business risk does not negate other aspects of this policy that require subject matter expert review and legal review.

Required Subject Matter Expert Reviews

Certain contracts must be reviewed by the University unit responsible for compliance or expertise in a particular subject matter. If a contract includes provisions that require subject matter review (for example, insurance, use of University trademarks or data security), units must contact the appropriate Subject Matter Expert as listed in the Appendix: Required Review by Subject Matter Experts before submitting the contract for legal review.

Legal Review

Before a contract is signed, a unit must do one of the following to manage legal risk:

  • use a Standard Contract;
  • use a contract that has been approved by the Office of the General Counsel (the “OGC”);
  • use a contract (including a form written and proposed by a vendor or the other party) that is exempt from legal review in accordance with (i) a checklist or instructions established by the OGC, (ii) a contract review procedure approved by the OGC, or (iii) other criteria for exemption established by the OGC; OR
  • submit the non-Standard Contract to the OGC for legal review.

See Appendix: Checklist for Purchasing Contracts that are Exempt from Review by the Office of the General Counsel.

Reason for Policy

This policy ensures:

  1. University contracts are entered into only by individuals with proper delegated authority.
  2. Risks are identified, assessed and managed before the University is legally bound to commitments.
  3. The University complies with applicable laws, regulations and prior contractual commitments.

Contacts

SubjectContactPhoneEmail
This PolicyElizabeth Lim612-625-5227[email protected]
Specific Contract TypesSee OGC Legal Services  

Also see Appendix: Required Review by Subject Matter Experts for specific contract topics.

Responsible Individuals
Responsible Officer Policy Owner Primary Contact
  • General Counsel
  • General Counsel
  • Elizabeth Lim

Definitions

Contract

A written agreement between the University and another person or entity that creates a binding obligation for the University, regardless of the document’s title and regardless of price. $0 agreements (the University is not paying a fee), click-through agreements (the agreement becomes binding upon clicking a check box) and online licenses (licenses to use technology or data available through an online platform) may constitute a contract if there are binding obligations. Written agreements solely between or among University departments or units are not considered contracts under this policy and are not subject to legal review. For examples of contracts, see the FAQ.

Standard Contract

A contract that appears in the University's Standard Contracts Library, in the University-Wide Agreements list, or in the Index of Contracts Administered by Capital Project Management. Attaching a signed unmodified Purchasing Addendum to Supplier’s Form (OGC-SC504) to a vendor’s purchase agreement constitutes a Standard Contract.

Non-Standard Contract

A contract that is not (i) a Standard Contract, (ii) a contract on a form or template reviewed and approved by the OGC within the past three years or (iii) a contract exempt from legal review in accordance with (a) a checklist or instructions established by the OGC, (b) a contract review procedure approved by the OGC, or (c) other criteria for exemption established by the OGC.

A contract in a form supplied by the vendor or the other party is not a Non-Standard Contract if the form of agreement is exempt from legal review as described above.

Responsibilities

Employee/Unit Arranging to Buy or Sell Goods or Services

Ensure employee(s) follow appropriate procedures and policies governing the purchase and contract.

Employee Signing a Contract with Delegation of Authority

  1. Sign contracts only if they are within the scope, financial limits and subject matter defined in the delegation.
  2. Read and comprehend all terms and conditions. Ensure it is accurate, being made for a proper purpose, in the best interests of the University and advances its mission.
  3. Evaluate legal, financial, operational and reputational risks before signing (see Appendix: Assessing Risk in the Business Terms of a Contract).
  4. Ensure the terms of the contract do not conflict with existing University contracts by consulting subject matter experts as necessary.
  5. Consult the appropriate subject matter experts to identify risks, confirm compliance requirements and obtain any required reviews (see Appendix: Required Review by Subject Matter Experts).
  6. Confirm the contract does not create an unreasonable risk to the University’s mission, reputation or funds. Verify the University can meet its contractual obligations. 

Contract Specialist

Review the terms of contracts, determine if University Information Security review is needed, determine if OGC review is needed, determine if other Subject Matter Expert review is needed prior to moving forward with the transaction. (The Contract Specialist is the individual with these responsibilities if designated by a unit; not all units will have a Contract Specialist).

Individuals with Expertise in Specific Contract Topics (Subject Matter Experts)

Evaluate contracts within the Subject Matter Expert’s field of responsibility for compliance with corresponding University policies and procedures, for any University-wide implications and for any major risks.

General Counsel

Recommend policy changes. Review contracts as set out in this policy. Maintain for the University an appropriate framework of internal control (1) to evaluate and protect the University’s interest in the execution of Contracts and (2) to ensure presentation to the Board of all contracts and transactions that require Board notification or specific Board approval.

Related Information

History

Amended:

March 2026 - Comprehensive Review. The primary change is to expand the number of purchase agreements that are exempt from OGC review by applying a risk matrix and allowing a unit to determine the agreement poses low risk. The prior version of the policy allowed for the following:

  1. use a standard contract,
  2. use a form agreement approved by OGC,
  3. use a form agreement that is exempt from OGC review, and
  4. submit the agreement for OGC review. The main policy change is to expand the third option for low risk purchases. We have found that OGC reviews a large number of contracts for purchases that are low in cost and also low in risk.

By allowing units to apply a risk matrix to these purchase agreements, it will expedite the lowest risk contracts. The revisions also clarify the role of the person with delegated authority to determine the risk posed to the university.

Amended:

December 2020 - Comprehensive review. Minor edits in policy and FAQ.

Effective:

December 2015 - New Policy. 1. Specifies when a standard contract or OGC review is needed on a non-standard form. 2. Provides a questionnaire for units to use to determine if the contract is exempt from review. 3. Provides detailed procedures for the processing of contracts.