University of Minnesota
University Relations
University of Minnesota
University of Minnesota
University of Minnesota
University M logo on copper background
Home : Human Resources : Workplace Rules and Guidelines

Relationship Between Internal Conflict Resolution Processes and Court Review

Printed on: . Please go to for the most current version of the Policy or related document.

Certain employment claims (sometimes referred to as common-law claims) against the University may be required to proceed through the internal formal petition process prior to seeking review by a court. For these claims, if an employee does not proceed in the petition process or fails to file a timely petition, the employee may forfeit the opportunity to have a court review the claim.

For other employment claims where a statute provides a remedy, sometimes referred to as statutory claims, a petitioner may have the option of proceeding directly to the courts without proceeding through the internal formal petition process.

In a petition, a petitioner may include all subject matter that is covered by this policy. If a petitioner chooses not to include all subject matter, the opportunity for court review of the omitted subject matter may be forfeited.

If a petitioner chooses arbitration of any issue, the petitioner is forfeiting the right to court review of the issue.

Document Feedback

Did this document successfully answer your questions?

Additional comments: (2000 character limit)

Email Address: (so we can respond to your questions)

© 2010 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on December 7, 2010